🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.